Neurodivergent Supply Chain Intelligence: Autism-Spectrum Advantage in Sustainable Logistics

Viraj P. Tathavadekar; Nitin R. Mahankale

doi:10.64229/kfwgz154

Authors

Viraj P. Tathavadekar Research Scholar, Symbiosis International University, Pune, India Author
Nitin R. Mahankale Associate Professor, Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies, Symbiosis International University, Pune, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/kfwgz154

Keywords:

Neurodiversity, Autism-spectrum, Supply Chain Sustainability, Cognitive Diversity, Green Logistics, Circular Economy, Pattern Recognition, Sustainability Performance

Abstract

This conceptual paper develops the first theoretical framework linking autism-spectrum cognitive traits to sustainable supply chain performance, introducing the Neurodivergent Sustainable Chain Intelligence Framework (NSCIF) to bridge neurodiversity research with green logistics management. The study employs conceptual theory development through systematic literature synthesis across neurodiversity and sustainable supply chain domains, followed by expert validation using a two-round Delphi study with 40 specialists (20 neurodiversity researchers and 20 supply chain sustainability professionals). The NSCIF framework identifies four key dimensions: Cognitive Advantage Dimensions (hyperfocus intensity, pattern recognition acuity, systematic processing, detail orientation), Sustainability Performance Amplifiers (carbon footprint precision, fraud detection capability, quality control excellence, circular design optimization), Organizational Integration Mechanisms (inclusive team structures, cognitive complementarity, accommodation protocols, performance measurement systems), and Sustainability Outcome Predictors (environmental performance, compliance accuracy, innovation capacity, stakeholder trust). Five theoretical propositions establish relationships between autism-spectrum cognitive traits and sustainability performance outcomes. This research represents a change in perspective from a deficit-based to a strength-based understanding of neurodiversity within supply chain contexts, providing the first systematic model connecting individual cognitive differences to organizational sustainability outcomes and establishing theoretical foundations for inclusive green supply chain design.

References

[1]Asrol, M., Marimin, Machfud, Yani, M., & Rohayati. (2024). A multi-criteria model of supply chain sustainability assessment and improvement for sugarcane agroindustry. Heliyon, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28259

[2]Bongomin, O., Mwape, M. C., Mpofu, N. S., Bahunde, B. K., Kidega, R., Mpungu, I. L., Tumusiime, G., Owino, C. A., Goussongtogue, Y. M., Yemane, A., Kyokunzire, P., Malanda, C., Komakech, J., Tigalana, D., Gumisiriza, O., & Ngulube, G. (2025). Digital twin technology advancing industry 4.0 and industry 5.0 across sectors. Results in Engineering, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105583

[3]Ciano, M. P., Peron, M., Panza, L., & Pozzi, R. (2025). Industry 4.0 technologies in support of circular Economy: A 10R-based integration framework. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2025.110867

[4]Doya, K., Ema, A., Kitano, H., Sakagami, M., & Russell, S. (2022). Social impact and governance of AI and neurotechnologies. Neural Networks, 152, 542-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2022.05.012

[5]Dudek, M., Bashynska, I., Filyppova, S., Yermak, S., & Cichoń, D. (2023). Methodology for assessment of inclusive social responsibility of the energy industry enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136317

[6]Guo, Y., Chen, T., Boulaksil, Y., Xiao, L., & Allaoui, H. (2023). Collaborative planning of multi-tier sustainable supply chains: A reinforcement learning enhanced heuristic approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109669

[7]Hamilton, L. G., & Petty, S. (2023). Compassionate pedagogy for neurodiversity in higher education: A conceptual analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1093290

[8]Hosseini Dehshiri, S. J., & Amiri, M. (2023). Considering the circular economy for designing closed-loop supply chain under hybrid uncertainty: A robust scenario-based possibilistic-stochastic programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121745

[9]Jahangiri, S., & Shokouhyar, S. (2024). An integrated FBWM-FCM-DEMATEL model to assess and manage the sustainability in the supply chain: A three-stage model based on the consumers' point of view. Applied Soft Computing, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111281

[10]Lovaas, O. I. (1993). The development of a treatment-research project for developmentally disabled and autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26(4), 617-630.

[11]Karmaker, C. L., Bari, A. B. M. M., Anam, M. Z., Ahmed, T., Ali, S. M., de Jesus Pacheco, D. A., & Moktadir, M. A. (2023). Industry 5.0 challenges for post-pandemic supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108806

[12]Kirchner-Krath, J., Morschheuser, B., Sicevic, N., Xi, N., von Korflesch, H. F. O., & Hamari, J. (2024). Challenges in the adoption of sustainability information systems: A study on green IS in organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102754

[13]Kou, G., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Eti, S., Olaru, G. O., & Hacıoğlu, Ü. (2025). Enhancing circular economy project outcomes via molecular fuzzy-based decision support system. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2025.103564

[14]Lenferink, S., Tillema, T., & Arts, J. (2012). Towards sustainable infrastructure development through integrated contracts: Experiences with inclusiveness in Dutch infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4), 615-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.014

[15]Li, H., Wei, X., & Gao, X. (2021). Objectives setting and instruments selection of circular economy policy in China's mining industry: A textual analysis. Resources Policy, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102410

[16]Lim, M. K., Li, Y., Wang, C., & Tseng, M. L. (2021). A literature review of blockchain technology applications in supply chains: A comprehensive analysis of themes, methodologies and industries. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107133

[17]Mallory, D. B., & Banerjee, B. (2024). "Capable of much more": The effects of vocational training on caregiver expectations for neurodivergent dependents in Thailand. PLOS ONE, 19(7), e0306141. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306141

[18]Moheb-Alizadeh, H., & Handfield, R. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: A novel multi-objective programming model with a hybrid solution approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 129, 192-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.011

[19]Nguyen, T., Duong, Q. H., Nguyen, T. V., Zhu, Y., & Zhou, L. (2021). Knowledge mapping of digital twin and physical internet in Supply Chain Management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108381

[20]Oliveira, P. S. P. C., Ferreira, F. A. F., Dabić, M., Ferreira, J. J. M., & Ferreira, N. C. M. Q. F. (2024). Analyzing the causal dynamics of circular-economy drivers in SMES using interpretive structural modeling. Energy Economics, 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107842

[21]Szász, L., Csíki, O., & Rácz, B. G. (2021). Sustainability management in the global automotive industry: A theoretical model and survey study. International Journal of Production Economics, 235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108085

[22]Westman, L., Moores, E., & Burch, S. L. (2020). Bridging the governance divide: The role of SMEs in urban sustainability interventions. Cities, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102944

[23]Yasin, Y., Riaz, M., Kausar, R., & Aslam, M. (2024). Enhancing sustainability in supply chain management using softmax Schweizer-Sklar information aggregation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108181

Neurodivergent Supply Chain Intelligence: Autism-Spectrum Advantage in Sustainable Logistics

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License