Evolving Psychological Contracts for Women Across Life Stages and Career Paths: The Dynamic Equilibrium Framework for Hybrid Work Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/9asch462Keywords:
Psychological Contracts, Women's Career Development, Life-stage Transitions, Hybrid Work Arrangements, Equilibrium Contracting, Workplace Gender EquityAbstract
This viewpoint paper addresses a critical gap in psychological contract literature by proposing a comprehensive framework that recognizes how women's workplace expectations evolve across distinct life stages and career trajectories within contemporary hybrid work arrangements. The Dynamic Equilibrium Framework (DEF) emerges from synthesizing life-course perspectives with gendered workplace research and emerging work design principles. The framework operationalizes psychological contracts by integrating four life-stage dimensions with five equilibrium factors to create adaptive employment agreements. Traditional psychological contracts inadequately serve women's intersectional experiences across varied career stages. The Dynamic Equilibrium Framework reveals that women require contracts capable of continuously balancing five key considerations: autonomy-structure, growth-stability, individuality-collaboration, flexibility-accountability, and care-career progression throughout four distinct life phases. This research presents the first construction of a Dynamic Equilibrium Framework specifically addressing gendered psychological contracts, introducing the concept of "Equilibrium Contracting" as maintaining balance between competing demands across women's evolving life circumstances. While the framework requires empirical validation across multiple organizational contexts and industrial sectors, future research should pursue longitudinal applications and cross-cultural adaptations. Organizations can implement more effective retention and engagement strategies through equilibrium-based psychological contracts that adapt to women's changing life-stage needs while maintaining organizational objectives. By addressing the diverse experiences of women throughout their professional lifecycles, this framework contributes to advancing gender equity in workplace environments.
References
[1]Henneman, A., Thornby, K., & Bookstaver, B. (2022). Reflections on work-life integration post-pandemic: A perspective from pharmacy practice faculty. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 14(4), 393-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2022.03.001
[2]Iogansen, X., Malik, J.K., Lee, Y., & Circella, G. (2024). Change in work arrangement during the COVID-19 pandemic: A large shift to remote and hybrid work. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 25, 100969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100969
[3]Zacher, H., & Froidevaux, A. (2021). Life stage, lifespan, and life course perspectives on vocational behavior and development: A theoretical framework, review, and research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103476
[4]Eng, I., Tjernberg, M., & Champoux-Larsson, M. (2024, December). Hybrid workers describe aspects that promote effectiveness, work engagement, work-life balance, and health. Cogent Psychology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2024.2362535
[5]Kaliannan, M., Darmalinggam, D., Dorasamy, M., & Abraham, M. (2023). Inclusive talent development as a key talent management approach: A systematic literature review. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100926
[6]Cao, Y., Lee, J., & Waung, M. (2023, February 20). Cultivating organizational attraction: A resource view on psychological contracts of career development among interns. Personnel Review, 52(1), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2021-0301
[7]Mishra, N., & Bharti, T. (2024, February 13). Exploring the nexus of social support, work–life balance and life satisfaction in hybrid work scenario in learning organizations. The Learning Organization, 31(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-08-2022-0099
[8]Marthalina, M., Joeliaty, J., Yunizar, Y., & Soemaryani, I. (2025, March 31). Work-life balance woman working in the government sector. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2024-4372
[9]Lan, J., & Feng, T. (2025). Role of remote working center in a hybrid work culture. Cities, 159, 105754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105754
[10]Poma, E., Curzi, Y., & Pistoresi, B. (2025, April 1). Organizational conditions, work–life balance and work ability of healthcare workers. Journal of Health Organization and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-07-2024-0309
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pallavi Priya Silveira(Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.